A message was sent to the Barnard alumnae community misinforming them that none of the people arrested on the day of the Milstein sit-in were Barnard students. There was, in fact, one confirmed Barnard student who was arrested on her campus. Most of those arrested were confirmed to be Columbia affiliates. We will not list their names here so as to protect them from doxxing and harrasment.
Oddly, President Rosenbury's community message does not at any point condemn the sender of the bomb threat. But she does make sure to repeatedly condemn the unauthorized protest in Milstein.
She is right that the protesters did not take word of the bomb threat seriously. The bomb threat was relayed by the same administrators who had been trying to get the protesters to leave since their demonstration began early that afternoon. Administrators made "shelter in place" announcements over the PA multiple times since the start of the protest as well as other scare tactics in an attempt to clear them over the course of the afternoon. The bomb threat was not accompanied by any security alarms at first. It was relayed by word of mouth (see video of administrator announcing bomb threat). A fire alarm was later activated, but it was unclear to the protesters whether that was yet another rouse by the administration who had cried wolf so many other times that day. When police arrived on campus, protestors complied with their orders to leave the building and to move onto Futter field where they continued their demonstration. Shortly thereafter, and seemingly without provocation, a number of student protesters were arrested. The police pushed protesters off campus but did not seek to evacuate others (video).
Michael Farley's message to alumnae following the sit-in at Milbank Hall on February 26 was misleading and contained disinformation.
The Barnard employee who was assaulted was a security guard who was pushed as the protesters rushed past him. Our colleagues were relieved to learn that he is ok and was not seriously injured, but apparently the administration didn't think you'd care to know that.
Protesters were demanding to meet with the Dean of the College and did not pose a threat to the campus. The wide halls of Milbank allowed for students to enter the building and walk to their classrooms while protest activity continued; however, the administration chose to lock students, faculty, and staff out of the building.
Promises of amnesty were in fact made, as well as concessions. These were negotiated between administrators and student protesters over several hours with the help of faculty mediators who patiently relayed messages from administrators and listened to the concerns of the student protesters. They were promised that no disciplinary action would be taken for the sit-in if they left the building by 10:40pm, which they did. As a concession, they were also promised a meeting with Dean Grinage which was rescinded the next day. These take-backs undermine the hours of patient, hard work the faculty mediators put in and the trust that they worked to establish on behalf of the administration.
[sources]